Comments on: OUR GREAT COURTS http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/ Exposing government interference and political influence where it should not be!!! Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:40:32 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-328 Anonymous Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:47:09 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-328 how about bail conditions as follows<br /><br />1-not to breath. ever<br />2-not to be a burden to society how about bail conditions as follows

1-not to breath. ever
2-not to be a burden to society

]]> By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-327 Anonymous Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:45:26 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-327 bless the magistrates. you have to love them. after all they are the people chosen to perform the task of overseeing court cases.and not believing police officers when they tell their version of events. because naturally a shit bag with a long list of pre-cons for assaulting police officers didnt know a uniformed police officer was arresting him, panicked and lashed out. yes. that really believeable, no seriously it is.<br />anyway, the next time he 'panicks and lashes out' i hope its a magistrate who happens to walk past at the same time the scroat is putting the boot in for the 5th time because he panicked. bless the magistrates. you have to love them. after all they are the people chosen to perform the task of overseeing court cases.and not believing police officers when they tell their version of events. because naturally a shit bag with a long list of pre-cons for assaulting police officers didnt know a uniformed police officer was arresting him, panicked and lashed out. yes. that really believeable, no seriously it is.
anyway, the next time he ‘panicks and lashes out’ i hope its a magistrate who happens to walk past at the same time the scroat is putting the boot in for the 5th time because he panicked.

]]> By: blackinblue http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-322 blackinblue Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:38:18 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-322 Mr G, you can't say "stupid magistrates." They'll have you for that. These people are qualified aren't they? Or are you saying they are clueless and qualified? I am having a bad day, OK I am having a really bad two weeks! Mr G, you can’t say “stupid magistrates.” They’ll have you for that. These people are qualified aren’t they? Or are you saying they are clueless and qualified? I am having a bad day, OK I am having a really bad two weeks!

]]> By: Inspector Gadget http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-321 Inspector Gadget Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:40:37 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-321 Please don't start me on the subject of stupid/weak Magistrates............... I'm going to have to go and lie down in a darkened room. Please don’t start me on the subject of stupid/weak Magistrates…………… I’m going to have to go and lie down in a darkened room.

]]> By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-319 Anonymous Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:01:32 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-319 yeah, you're right, one can dream though.......(not of the soap on a rope)! yeah, you’re right, one can dream though…….(not of the soap on a rope)!

]]> By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-318 Anonymous Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:51:31 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-318 I suspect we would end up in prison at some stage!!<br />Copper in prison, not a good prospect, I dont like soap on a rope. I suspect we would end up in prison at some stage!!
Copper in prison, not a good prospect, I dont like soap on a rope.

]]> By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-317 Anonymous Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:36:46 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-317 Just nick an old van, then you anda few mates tour the area one night, balaclava'd up, make sure you're wearing face masks and gloves (DNA sample etc) find the c***t, beat the shit to an inch of his life with some base ball bats, tell him never to steal or be a nuisance again otherwise you'll faind him and cut his heart out, then drive off, (phone for an ambulance of course), dump and torch the van, burn all your clothing, and see what happens. Just nick an old van, then you anda few mates tour the area one night, balaclava’d up, make sure you’re wearing face masks and gloves (DNA sample etc) find the c***t, beat the shit to an inch of his life with some base ball bats, tell him never to steal or be a nuisance again otherwise you’ll faind him and cut his heart out, then drive off, (phone for an ambulance of course), dump and torch the van, burn all your clothing, and see what happens.

]]> By: justacop http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-316 justacop Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:47:26 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-316 The problem is that the CPS would not allow that to be charged as per the CPS charging decisions. That would have to be run by them before custody sergeant could charge so it's a non-starter. The problem is that the CPS would not allow that to be charged as per the CPS charging decisions. That would have to be run by them before custody sergeant could charge so it’s a non-starter.

]]> By: blackinblue http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-315 blackinblue Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:51:58 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-315 South West hello, per the defenition, they commit a burglary. CPS might not wish to run with it, but that has got to be worth a try. If CPS don't run with it, it's their issue, but at some stage these people will go down, surely. And burglary is better than theft. I'd charge it, and then watch the CPS lawyers run around trying to knock it down! That'd be fun.... South West hello, per the defenition, they commit a burglary. CPS might not wish to run with it, but that has got to be worth a try. If CPS don’t run with it, it’s their issue, but at some stage these people will go down, surely. And burglary is better than theft. I’d charge it, and then watch the CPS lawyers run around trying to knock it down! That’d be fun….

]]> By: PC South West http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-314 PC South West Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:11:58 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-314 What does sentencing have to do with bail conditions?<br />You know as well as I do that the government changing wont make a difference anyway, they will need pressurising too. <br /><br />As for shoplifters who are trespassing, CPS will never run it as a burglary in a million years. We have tried that numerous times. What does sentencing have to do with bail conditions?
You know as well as I do that the government changing wont make a difference anyway, they will need pressurising too.

As for shoplifters who are trespassing, CPS will never run it as a burglary in a million years. We have tried that numerous times.

]]> By: Hit Man http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-313 Hit Man Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:21:32 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-313 The banning means:<br />"...enters as a trespasser..."<br />any theft then becomes a burglary.<br /><br />Considering how the government has tied Magistrates' hands, what on earth do you realistically expect the Bench to do, within the Law?<br /><br />Maximum sentence of six months imprisonment equals 60 days, which is not at all a deterrence for the recidivist.<br /><br />You want better deterrence?<br />Change the government! The banning means:
“…enters as a trespasser…”
any theft then becomes a burglary.

Considering how the government has tied Magistrates’ hands, what on earth do you realistically expect the Bench to do, within the Law?

Maximum sentence of six months imprisonment equals 60 days, which is not at all a deterrence for the recidivist.

You want better deterrence?
Change the government!

]]> By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-311 Anonymous Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:11:09 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-311 Don't you just love the way the courts think.<br />I had a similar thing recently. The scumbag was stealing cars during the daytime. So the court put him on a curfew to remain at home between 2200 and 0600 hrs.<br />Mind you, I caught him a week later breaching his bail cons and finally got him where he deserves to be - jail.<br />I wish the courts would see things our way, the only way to stop these habitual offenders from offending, is to lock them up. They broke the laws of the land to begin with, do you expect them to comply with Bail conditions ?? Don’t you just love the way the courts think.
I had a similar thing recently. The scumbag was stealing cars during the daytime. So the court put him on a curfew to remain at home between 2200 and 0600 hrs.
Mind you, I caught him a week later breaching his bail cons and finally got him where he deserves to be – jail.
I wish the courts would see things our way, the only way to stop these habitual offenders from offending, is to lock them up. They broke the laws of the land to begin with, do you expect them to comply with Bail conditions ??

]]> By: AntiSocialWatch http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-310 AntiSocialWatch Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:00:54 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-310 When people are this persistent, this prolific, they need locking up, not releasing with conditions...Hello SouthWest ;o) When people are this persistent, this prolific, they need locking up, not releasing with conditions…Hello SouthWest ;o)

]]> By: PC South West http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-306 PC South West Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:46:23 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-306 Like I said before he can get his other half to buy his food for him, that is if he ever bought his food, because he steals it anyway. The fact that he has been arrested again proves that no bail conditions will work anyway.<br />But at least CCTV could alert us when they see him entering a shop and he would be arrested. Like I said before he can get his other half to buy his food for him, that is if he ever bought his food, because he steals it anyway. The fact that he has been arrested again proves that no bail conditions will work anyway.
But at least CCTV could alert us when they see him entering a shop and he would be arrested.

]]> By: Anonymous http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-305 Anonymous Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:25:46 +0000 http://pcsouthwest.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/our-great-courts/#comment-305 "In fairness to the magistrates, banning him from all retail premises in the town in which he lives would give him a choice between breaching his bail conditions and doing without food"<br /><br />..... and he'll starve to death. The problem with this is ..... ? “In fairness to the magistrates, banning him from all retail premises in the town in which he lives would give him a choice between breaching his bail conditions and doing without food”

….. and he’ll starve to death. The problem with this is ….. ?

]]>